General

Trump’s Hush Money Court Case Faces Delays and Disputes

The scheduled hearing in Donald Trump’s court case is going to take place on Monday in New York. The legal battle over the hush money case Trump is fighting is a matter of interest for many. It remains to be seen if Donald Trump will face the trial and, for that matter, when that will be scheduled.

A deadline was issued in the form of a $464 million penalty for the civil fraud court case, which will expire on Monday. The sudden release of documents prompted this delay in the proceedings. The documents were in the form of tens of thousands of records from an earlier federal investigation.

Originally slated to commence jury selection, Trump made an appearance in court for a hearing instead. Interestingly, legal experts from Trump’s side pleaded that due to the release of these documents, the case should be either dismissed or postponed for at least three months.

Prosecutors, on the other hand, contend that the cache offers no reason for additional delay and includes little new information.
Juan M. Merchan, the presiding judge, called both parties to the court on Monday to clarify the circumstances surrounding the document release.
This inquiry is to assess who ought to be held responsible and to determine the appropriate course of action.

Trump insists he is innocent and calls the prosecution a politically driven effort. Interestingly, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the prosecutor in charge, is a Democrat.

The main accusation in the court case is that Trump misrepresented the payments totaling $130,000 as legal costs in the records of his business. The prosecution said that the purpose of these payments was to intimidate adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who had previously claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Trump. According to Trump’s legal team, the money paid to Michael Cohen, his attorney at the time, was just an ordinary expense and wasn’t part of a plot to conceal anything.

Now emerging as a key witness for the prosecution is Cohen, who entered a guilty plea in 2018 to federal charges involving campaign finance violations connected to the Daniels payment. He insists that Trump gave him the order to arrange the payment, a claim that federal prosecutors have backed up. However, Trump has not been charged with anything related to this in the court case.

Trump’s lawyers allege that they received only a fraction of the materials from the federal investigation into Cohen last June, with the bulk arriving after they subpoenaed federal prosecutors in January. They argued that the prosecution did not thoroughly look at all relevant documents associated with the case.  Although the public has not yet been made aware of the contents of the recently released documents, Trump’s legal team believes that some of the information may help in getting him cleared in the court case. 

Prosecutors counter that the vast majority of the documents are irrelevant or redundant, merely reiterating evidence from Cohen’s prior conviction.

Based on the recent document disclosure, the legal team from Trump’s side is asking for a postponement for this case until the Supreme Court makes a decision in another court case concerning Trump. That case was regarding the former president’s claims of presidential immunity in the case of electoral interference. 

The date for a hearing in the Supreme Court for the arguments is April 25th. The impact of Monday’s hearing decision will significantly affect the future of other cases of Trump that he is fighting in court.

Share if you like the post

Shane Golliver

Hello friends! Shane here. I have a keen interest in politics, and I report on political and general events from all over the world. With twelve years of experience in writing and reporting on various topics, I find it challenging to report on different fields. Swirtching the roles is a challenge that I find interesting. My email is shane@timesworldnow.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *